TL;DR
A study by Teads and Realeyes found that short-form video ads have higher view-through rates on mobile devices, but long-form ads are better at building a narrative and eliciting emotions. The study analyzed 166 6-second creatives from 75 brands and found that only 16 percent of the ads included a call to action.
With mobile video advertising increasing 145 percent with $4.2 billion dollars spent in 2018, it's crucial for brands to understand the effects of their efforts. A recent study conducted by media platform Teads in conjunction with researcher Realeyes analyzed 166 6-second creatives from 75 brands to determine the effectiveness of short-form ads.
Results indicated that short-form video ads play better when it comes to viewership with an average view-through rate of 55 percent on mobile devices, but their long-form counterparts score significantly better when it comes to building a narrative and eliciting emotions.
As part of its analysis, Teads impressed upon brands that a call to action is “vital” to drive better engagement, noting just 16 percent of the short-form ads the study incorporated a call to action.
"With mobile now the dominant device in our lives, marketers know that 30 second TV spots will no longer cut it for engaging video ads on the small screen,” said Teads Global VP of Research and Insights Caroline Hugonenc. “However, what this research reveals is that simply making an ad shorter won't necessarily guarantee performance if the emotional connection is lost.”
In this story
This story was originally published in 1851 Franchise on November 8, 2018. Burnaze summarizes and links to the original reporting.
Read the full story at 1851 FranchiseLiked this? Get the week's franchise news, explained
- Sunday 8 AM ET weekly + a monthly deep dive
- Sections picked for the industries you follow
- Every claim linked to its source. Free.
