TL;DR
The article discusses the importance of operational excellence in an organization, citing categories such as a clearly defined North Star and KPIs. It applies these categories to a hypothetical scenario of reducing restaurant buildout costs from $1m to $600,000.
Product + People + Operational Excellence = Greatness.
I think a lot about creating operational excellence. Some of the categories I look at are:
A clearly defined North Star: Does the company understand what the goal is?
KPIs: What are the indicators of how well people are doing and what is the effort to win at those?
Communication: How are you communicating the expectations of the organization and have you communicated the North Star and the KPIs clearly?
Playbook: Have you documented the process well enough so that there is a map to success?
Giants: Are the giants leading the organization to excellence through the above points?
I was recently thinking about ways to challenge the norm of operational excellence to push an organization to even better results. To this point, I thought about a hypothetical brand that has had some challenges with the buildout cost of their restaurants. My thought process was the following:
Who leads the buildout? Marketing. Why? Because they control the brand.
Why doesn’t operations lead the buildout? If you challenged an operations team to figure out how to, for argument’s sake, hit $600,000 in buildout costs, could they do it? Probably. How would they do that? They would start with all of the necessary tools to run the restaurant and then worry about aesthetics, versus the other way around.
What if in this scenario, buildout was going from $1m to $600,000, causing AUVs to drop. Could marketing then engineer concepts to bring them back up?
When thinking about that scenario, I then landed back on my categories. Could those categories be applied back to the challenge of lowing the cost of restaurant buildout?
A clearly defined North Star: Lower the cost of buildout from $1m to $600,000 so that the brand has the possibility of better growth with a wider spread of investors ($600,000 is easier than $1m+).
Communications: We have engineered the buildout to be more cost-effective so that the single unit operators of yesterday (at $1m) can now be multi-unit owners faster.
Playbook: Lower cost; new marketing strategy.
Giants: Operations to marketing to development.
What I learned from thinking about this is that once you have an operational playbook for how you want to communicate and measure your new concepts, you win. Without operational giants, though, this doesn’t work.
So, when looking for giants, I now want to make sure they are supported with operational creators who challenge norms and create solutions to problems through proper planning, communication, expectations and results.
In this story
This story was originally published in 1851 Franchise on July 12, 2018. Burnaze summarizes and links to the original reporting.
Read the full story at 1851 FranchiseLiked this? Get the week's franchise news, explained
- Sunday 8 AM ET weekly + a monthly deep dive
- Sections picked for the industries you follow
- Every claim linked to its source. Free.
