Mike Drumm on Franchise Law, Compliance and Scaling

Mike Drumm has built a career on the belief that franchise law should be as practical and efficient as the businesses it protects.

Read the original at 1851 Franchise
Mike Drumm on Franchise Law, Compliance and Scaling

TL;DR

Mike Drumm, founder of Drumm Law, discusses the importance of centralized compliance and litigation avoidance for franchisors. He advises against beta testing new strategies on franchisees and emphasizes the need for efficient, low-overhead legal services.

Mike Drumm has built a career on the belief that franchise law should be as practical and efficient as the businesses it protects. As the founder of Drumm Law, a virtual firm that challenges the traditional billable-hour model, Drumm has abandoned the high overhead, suit-and-tie approach in favor of technology-driven, business-minded legal representation. With a focus on litigation avoidance and specialized expertise in navigating the complexities of the "accidental franchise," he acts as both a legal shield and a strategic advisor to entrepreneurs.

1851 Franchise connected with Drumm to discuss the importance of centralized compliance, why franchisors should never "beta test" on their franchisees and the lessons from two decades in the industry that continue to shape his philosophy of providing efficient, low-overhead legal services.

Mike Drumm: I was a husky kid growing up so my love of franchises came at an early age. As the founder of a law firm (an entrepreneur), I like helping other entrepreneurs (franchisors) help other entrepreneurs (franchisees).

Drumm: I see brands underestimating the “accidental franchise” all the time. It’s the business equivalent of a “we’re just hanging out” mantra suddenly turning into a 20-year marriage with a mortgage. These brands think they’re just doing a “license agreement” or a “partnership” because they want to avoid the F-word: franchising. Then they realize they’ve provided a brand, collected a fee and exerted control (and legally, they’ve just eloped without a prenup). By the time they call me, I’m basically a divorce attorney trying to fix a marriage that was never supposed to happen.

1851: In your experience, where do emerging franchisors tend to get tripped up from a compliance or documentation standpoint?

Drumm: Emerging brands often treat documentation like a chore they can catch up on later. But I see it as the foundation of the house. If you aren't dotting your i’s, crossing your t’s and making sure those lower-case j’s are handled, then the whole structure is shaky.

I’m constantly pushing my clients to move away from ad hoc paperwork and toward a centralized compliance database. It’s about creating a single source of truth for every FDD version and every signed receipt. It’s not the most glamorous part of the business.

But it’s the difference between a brand that scales and a brand that gets stuck in litigation purgatory.

Drumm: My biggest piece of advice for scale is to never beta test on the backs of your franchisees. If you have a new growth strategy, prove it yourself first at a company-owned site. It’s a lot easier to fix a mistake when it’s your own bank account on the line. Controlled growth with a purpose will pay off in dividends in the future.

Drumm: Litigation avoidance. If you go to court (or arbitration), only the lawyers win. I prefer to get my wins on closing deals and not by going to court.

Drumm: The client may not know that the legal document is excellent, but they will know that you misspelled their name. Sincerely, Mike Drum of Dumm Law.

In this story

This story was originally published in 1851 Franchise on June 5, 2026. Burnaze summarizes and links to the original reporting.

Read the full story at 1851 Franchise

Liked this? Get the week's franchise news, explained

  • Sunday 8 AM ET weekly + a monthly deep dive
  • Sections picked for the industries you follow
  • Every claim linked to its source. Free.

Free. We'll ask you to confirm. Unsubscribe anytime.